In April, Vodafone unequivocally told the DoT that it had no legal basis to reject its application to renew its licenses. Due to the DoT`s continued silence, Vodafone has now filed a lawsuit. You must not link to this Website and/or its pages in any content that violates these Terms or is otherwise inconsistent with Vodafone`s general values and objectives, including, but not limited to, adult content, violent or illegal content or websites containing adult content, violent or illegal content. In 2014, Vodafone initiated arbitration proceedings against India. If you are a consumer, please note that these Terms of Use, their subject matter and formation are governed by English law. You and we both agree that the courts of England and Wales will have exclusive jurisdiction, except that if you reside in Northern Ireland, you may also sue in Northern Ireland, and if you reside in Scotland, you may also sue in Scotland. immediately notify Vodafone of any unauthorised use of the Website or any other breach of security, or any claim or legal action against you in connection with your use of the Website; India`s finance ministry said it would carefully review the price with its lawyers. “As a result of these consultations, the government will consider all options and make a decision on how to proceed, including remedies,” the ministry said in a statement. Vodafone India has filed a lawsuit against a decision by the country`s Ministry of Telecommunications after rejecting the operator`s request to renew its licenses in Delhi, Kolkata and Mumbai. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Vodafone, its servants and agents from and against any liability, loss, damage (including legal fees and expenses), claim or proceeding (actual or threatened) incurred by you as a result of your use of the Website by you, your agents or any third party in breach of these Terms and Conditions (including, but without limitation, your inability to obtain consent from third parties to whom you send unsolicited messages for direct purposes). for marketing purposes). The court said in its ruling that the government`s request violated “fair and equitable treatment” and that it should stop collecting Vodafone`s fees.
He also ordered India to pay £4.3 million ($5.47 million) to the company as compensation for its legal fees, one of the sources added. The lawsuit joins a $2.6 billion tax dispute between Vodafone and the Indian government, which has stalled due to numerous external factors. The upcoming elections in 2014 are likely to delay any progress on this issue by a year. Vodafone said it was “in talks with the Indian government and. I hope to find an amicable solution. You may link to our website and/or its pages, provided that you do so in a fair and legal manner and do not damage or take advantage of our reputation. You agree not to use, cause or permit any content we make available here: to compromise or impair the operation, quality or integrity of the Site or the operation, quality or integrity of any telecommunications network; By using this website, you consent to security monitoring and auditing. For security reasons and to ensure that the public service remains accessible to users, this government computer system uses network traffic monitoring programs to identify unauthorized attempts, upload or modify information, or otherwise cause damage, including attempts to deny service to users. the loss, damage or overwriting of any information, material, data, communication or message; You may not use any part of the content of this website for commercial purposes without obtaining a license from us or our licensors. Please report your traffic by updating your user agent to include company-specific information.
NEW DELHI (Reuters) – Vodafone Group Plc VOD. L said on Friday it had won an international arbitration against the Indian government, ending one of the country`s best-known disputes over a $2 billion tax claim. The Site is provided “as is” and all conditions and warranties, express or implied by statute or common law, are excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. In particular, Vodafone makes no warranties or representations: if a user or application sends more than 10 requests per second, subsequent requests from the IP address may be restricted for a short period of time. Once the request rate drops below the threshold for 10 minutes, the user can continue to access the content on SEC.gov. This SEC practice is designed to limit excessive automated searches to SEC.gov and is not intended or should not affect individuals who visit the SEC.gov site. Our standards: Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. Although we make reasonable efforts to update the information on this website, we make no representations, warranties or warranties, express or implied, that the content on our website is accurate, complete or current. To reduce future arbitration requests, India has terminated such agreements with more than 50 countries and is working on a new law to protect foreign investors by offering relief from potential policy changes, while retaining the right to tax them, Reuters reported. The decision ends one of India`s most contentious disputes under international treaty agreements it enters into with countries to protect foreign investment.
whether in contract, tort (including negligence), breach of statutory duty or otherwise, even if Vodafone or any of its suppliers has been advised of the possibility of such loss, damage, cost or expense. PRESS RELEASE: FTC accepts divestment to maintain competition in postal automation systems market However, some observers doubt that this is the case. Arun Giri, the head of India`s tax information service Taxsutra, said: “There will be no deal, it is not going in that direction. There is a lot of resistance from the tax authorities to let Vodafone go. » We reserve the right to revoke permission to link without notice. access, obtain or transmit any information, documents, data, communications, messages, software and services through the Site (or linked sites); Vodafone`s tax dispute dates back to the $11 billion deal to buy Hutchison Whampoa`s Indian mobile phone assets in 2007. The government said Vodafone was obliged to pay taxes on the takeover, which the company denied.